Tuesday 20 August 2013

Cellulite Solutions (Part 1)


 

In the previous two pieces we saw that cellulite is a really a created term propagated by the cosmetic industry to lull an ever increasing supply of consumers into paying for products and services of dubious efficacy. Even with the high-end treatments the change in appearance is a temporary one at best, and at worst a causative agent in the aggravation of the condition.

In this piece we’ll begin to look at the conditions that contribute to the symptoms that are collectively called cellulite and in understanding these factors try to divine the interventions needed to modify the causes of the situation.

We have already seen that the three main symptoms that in combination give the bumpy appearance associated with cellulite are excess fat, circulatory insufficiency, and connective tissue architecture.

Although it’s thought that cellulite is mainly a female concern, a larger proportion of men than is readily apparent actually have a condition similar to cellulite, its just better concealed. Part of the cellulite condition is inadequate thickness of the skin, which is why there are in fact many individuals (both male and female) that have all of the other traits of cellulite, but because they have thicker skin, the lumps and bumps aren’t as visible. This intervention (thickening the skin) is actually one of the more successful interventions being offered by the medical and cosmetic industries alike.

One of the most effective methods of stimulating the body to remodel thicker skin is through the use of Retin-A; and herein lies a sorry tale. Retin-A works very effectively to remodel skin by removing damaged protein structures, and stimulating the growth of new proteins to create a more uniform and thicker skin. It was developed in the late 1960’s as a treatment for skin conditions such as acne vulgaris and keratosis pilaris (chicken skin). However, once Retin-A, which is a derivative of vitamin A (retinol), was shown to have real world effect, it was immediately seized by the pharmaceutical industry and is now a regulated treatment. This is true of many effective treatments, once they show real biological effect they are then usually re-classified as a drug and subsequently tightly regulated. Sometimes this is a good thing as some people really do need saving from themselves, sadly it does however restrict access to the more level headed of us.

So for most of us Retin-A is off the table but there are other chemicals that are accessible which perform a similar function; these are the hydroxy acids (alpha and beta). Hydroxy acids, like Retin-A, stimulate the growth of new proteins within the skin to produce a thicker more even tone. As suggested in the previous instalments, this isn’t an overnight effect, both Retin-A and Hydroxy acids stimulate the remodelling of your skin, but this is dependent upon physiological dynamics. The cells that make up your skin take a minimum of two weeks to turnover (they’re in constant flux, breaking down and re-building), but the change in each cycle is miniscule, so it takes a number of these cycles to create an appreciable effect. The remodelling process is reliant on the consistent provision of beneficial nutrients, the right signals and the minimisation of destructive stresses. Even with daily attention to providing the right environment for optimal skin health it will take at least 6-12 months to have any lasting effect. You have to grow a better body.

Nutrition for skin health is beyond the scope of this article, but here are a few tips to assist in the remodelling of skin towards a thicker, more evenly toned expression.

First, you need to wash, carefully. Keeping your skin clean is essential to minimise the toxins we are bombarded with daily from stressing the skin and causing an inflammatory condition which then prevents the effective remodelling of skin as well as at the same time as highlighting the hills and valleys due to fluid retention. However, over-zealous cleaning is counter-productive as it removes the natural humectant coating (moisture retaining substances) and disturbs the microbiome (bacteria) that maintains skin health. Excessive cleaning may in fact contribute to the appearance of cellulite by removing these two key features of the skin environment. Use gentle cleansers and do not use regular soap.

As well as maintaining skin hygiene, you can assist the process by gentle exfoliation. Uneven skin, like local inflammation, highlights the lumpy appearance of cellulite. Regular exfoliation to smooth out the skin will slightly reduce the appearance of cellulite, although it is a mostly cosmetic effect. It is however necessary to remove the flaky skin cells which contribute to irregular texture and also provides a ready source of nutrition (the skin cells) for specific bacteria that contributes to poor skin health. Again like cleansing, you need to be gentle and consistent, a few times per week is more than sufficient. The key is to encourage a better environment for healthy renewal, if you try to push it, however, the body will push back, often with results being the opposite for which you’d hoped.

Once you’ve thrown out the surface garbage, you can then attend to the task of remodelling the real skin structure. If you have access and you can afford it, then you can enlist the aid of a medical specialist hopefully well versed in dermatology who can provide you with an individual protocol for the use of Retin-A. The rest of us from more meagre holdings have to rely upon more accessible chemicals to assist us in stimulating an increased turnover of the proteins in the skin, which as we saw above were the hydroxy acids. There are three common hydroxy acids, lactic acid (alpha-) and glycolic acid (alpha-), which are both water soluble, and salicylic acid (beta-) which is lipid soluble. The lipid soluble beta-hydroxy acid is especially beneficial as it can penetrate through the fatty structures in the skin, so has a more widespread effect than the alpha-hydroxy acids. Daily and judicial use of these chemicals will gradually change the structure of the skin to a more healthy and abundant landscape (i.e. thicker and more uniform), but keep in mind that this will take a year or so for permanent (-ish) effect.

The final factor (in our small summary) that will vastly improve the health of your skin and improve the appearance of cellulite is the hydration status of your skin. Like the rest of your body, the skin is mostly water. However, due to its direct interaction with the environment, it has to deal with multiple stressors many of which cause it to dry out. I’ve covered previously how the hydration status of the cells in the body is in itself a potent signal that then dictates various cascades to either promote certain biochemical pathways or block them.

Most of the topical cellulite treatments simply work by causing the retention of water in the skin. This assists in the healthy turnover of the skin and temporarily smoothes out the skin, giving the illusion of reduced cellulite. One of the key ingredients that can achieve this is hyaluronic acid which helps to increase the skin's natural elastin levels. Hyaluronic acid does this by absorbing fairly large amounts of water which then supports the elasticity and youthful appearance of skin.

Performed regularly these activities will go some way to providing the skin with the correct signals to stimulate a thicker and more even skin texture and tone which in part will reduce the appearance of cellulite. This in itself is really only a cosmetic effect as we have done nothing to address the underlying connective tissue structure, nor the excess adiposity that is creating the pressure upon the collagen matrix. That is what we will address in the next piece in this series, as they are both fairly involved scenarios.

Friday 16 August 2013

Fleeting Fantasies (Cellulite Treatments)


Photo: Fleeting Fantasies

In the previous instalment (Peeling Back The Truth of Cellulite) we saw that cellulite is not truly a real discrete thing. It is however a perfect storm of contributory factors which lead to three primary manifestations: abnormal connective tissue, adipose excess and dysfunction, and local circulatory insufficiency. So to permanently reduce cellulite, all three of these symptoms, and more pertinently, their causes need to be addressed. The majority of treatments touted as cellulite ‘cures’, not only fail to use that simple premise, but by virtue of the mechanisms of some of the treatments (usually the ‘premium’ modalities) often exacerbate the issue in the long run.

The following are a few of the current treatments that propose to cure cellulite:

Laser

The use of laser therapy comes in a few different flavours, but the versions that are sufficiently powerful are obviously regulated and only available via medical professionals. The low power laser therapies offered by your local beauty therapist have an effect by a totally different mechanism.

The current professional therapies use a cannula with an integrated laser that is used to disrupt the fat cells and collagen fibers. This disruption will obviously change the structure in the area and temporarily improve the appearance of cellulite. However, it doesn’t change the environment that caused the cellulite to appear in the first place, so can’t prevent the re-appearance of the abnormal infrastructure. And because the treatment causes very rapid destruction of the tissues, it will feed into the chronic inflammatory cascade that is a prevalent factor in the cellulite condition. So it’s not unfeasible that the use of this invasive and highly destructive process could actually accelerate the condition. Of course this won’t be evident in the first 12 months or so as it will take time to re-grow the tissues, but once it does, the likelihood is that the situation will be even more aggressive than before the treatment.

Acoustic Wave

Therapies based on acoustics use a high frequency sound wave, it is proposed, to disrupt the adipose tissue that is pushing through the connective tissue matrix. There is limited evidence that this occurs, but even so even if it did work, like the laser therapy it doesn’t address the cause of the cellulite, and again may actually act as a promoter of subsequent development.

Mesotherapy

Mesotherapy uses injections to ‘dissolve’ the fat cells through the use of many different chemicals. The chemical used depends on the practitioner. Although the word ‘dissolve’ is often used for marketing purposes, the injections aim to cause cellular apoptosis (cell death) in the fatty tissue. If the treatment is successful in achieving what it suggests, it too will suffer from the same issues as the above two therapies. Tissues don’t simply dissolve and flush out of the body, it requires a huge local and systemic immune response to remove the debris, which as previously suggested will feed back into the process that promoted and maintained the development of cellulite.

Thermotherapy

Like the laser therapies there are a few different versions of this, the premium treatments again need to be performed by a medical professional. These premium treatments use radio-frequencies to target the underlying structures and generate high levels of local heating which like the above therapies cause cellular apoptosis and the resultant widespread debris caused by the death of cells in the tissues. There are side-effects of the treatment that do improve, temporarily, the cosmetic appearance of cellulite.

There are many other therapies that also claim to reduce cellulite such as Iontophoresis that uses galvanic currents to increase the permeability of the skin in an attempt to pass various substances through to the lower layers, or Electrophoresis that creates an electrical field that is suggested to alter the flow of nutrients in the area to increase the structure of the connective tissue to a more normal pattern and also assist in lipolysis (fat breakdown). Neither treatment has shown conclusive evidence of improvements in studies on cellulite.

In the more accessible treatments available to the public such as low level laser, iontophoresis, lymphatic drainage, wraps, and pressotherapy, the one common factor (whether overtly evident or not) is massage. Part of the issue with cellulite especially in the higher stages is localised oedema (swelling or fluid retention) which is a symptom of the inflammatory environment and various mechanical factors. The use of massage temporarily shifts the fluid out of the compartment and reduces the pressure being placed on the connective tissue matrix, giving the appearance of reduced cellulite. Given a few days or often hours, the osmotic pressures normalise and the fluid re-enters the area, and you’re back to square one. This is mostly how the crèmes and lotions ‘work’ too, via the fact that during application you are giving the area a daily massage. Massage does assist in the treatment of cellulite, and is a helpful part of the equation, but don’t confuse the temporary appearance change caused by some of the more aggressive treatments with anything being done to the actual structures. The main benefit of massage is to assist in the circulatory flow in the region, which needs to be a continual presence, not a once or twice a week temporary cosmetic illusion.

The above treatments cannot result in permanent alterations of the presence of cellulite, simply because they treat, with various efficacy, the symptoms of cellulite whether individual or in combination. They do nothing to address the underlying causes and will therefore allow the situation to continue, or as we have seen may actually intensify the progression of cellulite. In the next post we’ll look at how cellulite develops and once we’ve understood this environment we can then consider solutions to mitigate and even reverse the condition.



In the previous instalment (Peeling Back The Truth of Cellulite) we saw that cellulite is not truly a real discrete thing. It is however a perfect storm of contributory factors which lead to three primary manifestations: abnormal connective tissue, adipose excess and dysfunction, and local circulatory insufficiency. So to permanently reduce cellulite, all three of these symptoms, and more pertinently, their causes need to be addressed. The majority of treatments touted as cellulite ‘cures’, not only fail to use that simple premise, but by virtue of the mechanisms of some of the treatments (usually the ‘premium’ modalities) often exacerbate the issue in the long run.

The following are a few of the current treatments that propose to cure cellulite:

Laser

The use of laser therapy comes in a few different flavours, but the versions that are sufficiently powerful are obviously regulated and only available via medical professionals. The low power laser therapies offered by your local beauty therapist have an effect by a totally different mechanism.

The current professional therapies use a cannula with an integrated laser that is used to disrupt the fat cells and collagen fibers. This disruption will obviously change the structure in the area and temporarily improve the appearance of cellulite. However, it doesn’t change the environment that caused the cellulite to appear in the first place, so can’t prevent the re-appearance of the abnormal infrastructure. And because the treatment causes very rapid destruction of the tissues, it will feed into the chronic inflammatory cascade that is a prevalent factor in the cellulite condition. So it’s not unfeasible that the use of this invasive and highly destructive process could actually accelerate the condition. Of course this won’t be evident in the first 12 months or so as it will take time to re-grow the tissues, but once it does, the likelihood is that the situation will be even more aggressive than before the treatment.

Acoustic Wave

Therapies based on acoustics use a high energy wave, it is proposed, to disrupt the adipose tissue that is pushing through the connective tissue matrix. There is limited evidence that this occurs, but even so even if it did work, like the laser therapy it doesn’t address the cause of the cellulite, and again may actually act as a promoter of subsequent development.

Mesotherapy

Mesotherapy uses injections to ‘dissolve’ the fat cells through the use of many different chemicals. The chemical used depends on the practitioner. Although the word ‘dissolve’ is often used for marketing purposes, the injections aim to cause cellular apoptosis (cell death) in the fatty tissue. If the treatment is successful in achieving what it suggests, it too will suffer from the same issues as the above two therapies. Tissues don’t simply dissolve and flush out of the body, it requires a huge local and systemic immune response to remove the debris, which as previously suggested will feed back into the process that promoted and maintained the development of cellulite.

Thermotherapy

Like the laser therapies there are a few different versions of this, the premium treatments again need to be performed by a medical professional. These premium treatments use radio-frequencies to target the underlying structures and generate high levels of local heating which like the above therapies cause cellular apoptosis and the resultant widespread debris caused by the death of cells in the tissues. There are side-effects of the treatment that do improve, temporarily, the cosmetic appearance of cellulite.

There are many other therapies that also claim to reduce cellulite such as Iontophoresis that uses galvanic currents to increase the permeability of the skin in an attempt to pass various substances through to the lower layers, or Electrophoresis that creates an electrical field that is suggested to alter the flow of nutrients in the area to increase the structure of the connective tissue to a more normal pattern and also assist in lipolysis (fat breakdown). Neither treatment has shown conclusive evidence of improvements in studies on cellulite.

In the more accessible treatments available to the public such as low level laser, iontophoresis, lymphatic drainage, wraps, and pressotherapy, the one common factor (whether overtly evident or not) is massage. Part of the issue with cellulite especially in the higher stages is localised oedema (swelling or fluid retention) which is a symptom of the inflammatory environment and various mechanical factors. The use of massage temporarily shifts the fluid out of the compartment and reduces the pressure being placed on the connective tissue matrix, giving the appearance of reduced cellulite. Given a few days or often hours, the osmotic pressures normalise and the fluid re-enters the area, and you’re back to square one. This is mostly how the crèmes and lotions ‘work’ too, via the fact that during application you are giving the area a daily massage. Massage does assist in the treatment of cellulite, and is a helpful part of the equation, but don’t confuse the temporary appearance change caused by some of the more aggressive treatments with anything being done to the actual structures. The main benefit of massage is to assist in the circulatory flow in the region, which needs to be a continual presence, not a once or twice a week temporary cosmetic illusion.

The above treatments cannot result in permanent alterations of the presence of cellulite, simply because they treat, with various efficacy, the symptoms of cellulite whether individual or in combination. They do nothing to address the underlying causes and will therefore allow the situation to continue, or as we have seen may actually intensify the progression of cellulite. In the next post we’ll look at how cellulite develops and once we’ve understood this environment we can then consider solutions to mitigate and even reverse the condition

Peeling Back the Truth of Cellulite

 Photo: Peeling Back the Truth of Cellulite

Orange Peel, Mattress Skin, Cottage Cheese, Bubble Wrap are just a few of the words used to describe cellulite; the bumpy appearance some women and men exhibit especially in the abdomen and upper thighs.

Looking on Google, the search term ‘cellulite’ is an annual favourite, especially in the months leading up to summer. Despite the apparent widespread acceptance as a real phenomenon, it is not actually an acknowledged term in medicine. Which in their (the medical orthodoxy) defence, is actually closer to the truth than marketers would have you believe. At one end of the scale the medical establishment, if asked, will inform you that ‘cellulite’ is simply body-fat. At the other end of the scale the marketers, of endless products and treatments, will have you believe that cellulite is a discrete type of tissue that can only be removed by use of this newly discovered secret and proprietary mechanism. The ‘discreteness’, of course, is different in each case depending on what and how the product or treatment they hope to sell you works. The truth, as you’ll see, lies somewhere in between these two; but very much closer to the orthodox medical end of the spectrum.

The term ‘cellulite’ was coined in the 1920’s but didn’t really become a household term until the 1970’s when cosmetic companies got hold of it and used it in combination with the twin darlings of marketing ‘vanity’ and ‘fear’, to sell dubious crèmes and lotions, that cost pennies to make and that sold at a premium. As we’ll see, although the application of these crèmes does temporarily (hours) reduce the appearance (not the real structure) of cellulite, use of these crèmes may actually hasten its development.

Body-fat ‘is’ a major player in cellulite, the medical establishment are absolutely correct on that, but, that’s not where the story ends. Cellulite is not simply caused by body-fat alone, it’s a combination of specific local structures caused by the interplay of energetics, hormones and other physiological factors that all contribute to this condition. In simple terms it’s excessively full fat cells protruding through the mesh of connective tissue in the skin above.

Before we get into the details of the conditions that contribute to cellulite (in successive posts) or the current ‘treatments’ purported as cures (next post), I just want to quickly cover a very important point to help you navigate the disingenuous market-place to save you from being hoodwinked. Because of the physiological conditions that contribute to cellulite it takes at least 6 months of daily interventions to change. Anyone claiming to remove cellulite in a few treatments is not quite telling you the truth, whether intentionally or just through their own ignorance. And because of these specific physiological conditions, no degree of external (or internal, as you’ll see in the next post) prodding, poking, lasering, suction or wrapping will amount to anything permanent.

Cellulite is relatively simple to fix, but it does take a few lifestyle changes to do it properly. A saying I always bear in mind when considering my actions is ‘If you haven’t got the time to do it right, when will you find the time to do it over’. 

Do it right, once.

Orange Peel, Mattress Skin, Cottage Cheese, Bubble Wrap are just a few of the words used to describe cellulite; the bumpy appearance some women and men exhibit especially in the abdomen and upper thighs.

Looking on Google, the search term ‘cellulite’ is an annual favourite, especially in the months leading up to summer. Despite the apparent widespread acceptance as a real phenomenon, it is not actually an acknowledged term in medicine. Which in their (the medical orthodoxy) defence, is actually closer to the truth than marketers would have you believe. At one end of the scale the medical establishment, if asked, will inform you that ‘cellulite’ is simply body-fat. At the other end of the scale the marketers, of endless products and treatments, will have you believe that cellulite is a discrete type of tissue that can only be removed by use of this newly discovered secret and proprietary mechanism. The ‘discreteness’, of course, is different in each case depending on what and how the product or treatment they hope to sell you works. The truth, as you’ll see, lies somewhere in between these two; but very much closer to the orthodox medical end of the spectrum.

The term ‘cellulite’ was coined in the 1920’s but didn’t really become a household term until the 1970’s when cosmetic companies got hold of it and used it in combination with the twin darlings of marketing ‘vanity’ and ‘fear’, to sell dubious crèmes and lotions, that cost pennies to make and that sold at a premium. As we’ll see, although the application of these crèmes does temporarily (hours) reduce the appearance (not the real structure) of cellulite, use of these crèmes may actually hasten its development.

Body-fat ‘is’ a major player in cellulite, the medical establishment are absolutely correct on that, but, that’s not where the story ends. Cellulite is not simply caused by body-fat alone, it’s a combination of specific local structures caused by the interplay of energetics, hormones and other physiological factors that all contribute to this condition. In simple terms it’s excessively full fat cells protruding through the mesh of connective tissue in the skin above.

Before we get into the details of the conditions that contribute to cellulite (in successive posts) or the current ‘treatments’ purported as cures (next post), I just want to quickly cover a very important point to help you navigate the disingenuous market-place to save you from being hoodwinked. Because of the physiological conditions that contribute to cellulite it takes at least 6 months of daily interventions to change. Anyone claiming to remove cellulite in a few treatments is not quite telling you the truth, whether intentionally or just through their own ignorance. And because of these specific physiological conditions, no degree of external (or internal, as you’ll see in the next post) prodding, poking, lasering, suction or wrapping will amount to anything permanent.

Cellulite is relatively simple to fix, but it does take a few lifestyle changes to do it properly. A saying I always bear in mind when considering my actions is ‘If you haven’t got the time to do it right, when will you find the time to do it over’.

Do it right, once.

The Power of Words

 Photo: The Power of Words

The everyday language we repeatedly use shapes our behaviour. Habitually using the right words spoken in the right way can bring us compassion, respect and strength in life. The wrong words can all too easily bring us dislike, disrespect and instability. To improve our likelihood of achieving our goals and aspirations we have to improve what we say, not only to others but also to ourselves.

Whenever we feel sensations such as joy or sadness, those sensations are weighted emotionally by the word labels we attach to them. The labels that we attach to our experience become our thoughts and our memories of that experience. The phrase ‘I’m enraged’ leaves a very different emotional and biochemical memory pattern than does ‘I’m a bit miffed by that.’

Habitual self-language patterns are often not recognised, so people do not realise their influence. However you can begin to appreciate how they (words) affect you when you consider how we are spoken to by others. If somebody told you ‘I think you’re mistaken’, the phrase doesn’t create the same level of emotional response as somebody saying ‘You’re wrong’, and it certainly has nowhere near the same emotional response than if they had said, ‘You’re a damn liar’. All three phrases are essentially saying the same thing, but the level of emotional attachment is orders of magnitude different in each case.

A new study has shown how words in our environment, even on an unconscious level, can dramatically alter your behaviour 

Inhibitory self control such as not picking up a cigarette, not having a second drink, not spending when we should be saving, can operate without our awareness or intention.
            
Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg School for Communication and the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign) demonstrated through neuroscience research that inaction-related words in our environment can unconsciously influence our self-control. Mindlessly eating nibbly’s at a party or stopping ourselves from over-indulging may seem impossible without a deliberate, conscious effort. However, the research indicates that overhearing specific language, even in a completely unrelated conversation, saying something as simple as ‘calm down’ might trigger us to curtail our junkie-like biscuit eating frenzy without us even realising it.
            
Subjects in the study completed a task where they were given instructions to press a computer key when they saw the letter ‘X’ on the computer screen, or not press a key when they saw the letter ‘Y.’ Their actions were affected by subliminal messages flashing rapidly on the screen (too fast to be consciously seen). Action messages such as ‘run,’ ‘go,’ ‘move,’ ‘hit,’ and ‘start’ alternated with inaction messages ‘still,’ ‘sit,’ ‘rest,’ ‘calm,’ and ‘stop’ and nonsense words ‘rnu,’ or ‘tsi’. During the test the subjects wore an EEG (electroencephalogram) device to measure brain activity.

The test was cleverly set-up so that the action or inaction messages had nothing to do with the actions or inactions volunteers were doing, yet the researchers found that the action/inaction words had a definite effect on the volunteers’ brain activity. Unconscious exposure to inaction messages increased the activity of the brain’s self-control processes, whereas unconscious exposure to action messages decreased this same activity.
            
The researchers said ‘Many important behaviours such as weight loss, giving up smoking, and saving money involve a lot of self-control’. ‘While many psychological theories state that actions can be initiated automatically, with little or no conscious effort, these same theories view inhibition as an effortful, consciously controlled process. Although reaching for that cookie doesn’t require much thought, putting it back on the plate seems to require a deliberate, conscious intervention. Our research challenges the long-held assumption that inhibition processes require conscious control to operate.’

This study further reinforces the concept of words having power; regardless of whether the interaction is on a conscious or an unconscious level. 

A good idea (in general, not just in respect of this premise) is to expand your vocabulary. Find a new word to displace the words you usually use when you encounter a situation. Use the new words regularly to heighten the emotional intensity for the positive aspects of your life, and most importantly use new lower impact words for the negative experiences you encounter.

Gradually improving your habitual vocabulary is a wise investment. You’ll rapidly alter how you think, how you feel, and how you behave. Without question there will still be times, for example, when we feel justified in being incensed, but by controlling your language patterns, you will be able to control your emotions to direct and utilise them to better effect. Your choice. 

Reference:

Justin Hepler, Dolores Albarracin. Complete unconscious control: Using (in)action primes to demonstrate completely unconscious activation of inhibitory control mechanisms. Cognition, 2013; 128 (3): 271 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.012
 
The everyday language we repeatedly use shapes our behaviour. Habitually using the right words spoken in the right way can bring us compassion, respect and strength in life. The wrong words can all too easily bring us dislike, disrespect and instability. To improve our likelihood of achieving our goals and aspirations we have to improve what we say, not only to others but also to ourselves.

Whenever we feel sensations such as joy or sadness, those sensations are weighted emotionally by the word labels we attach to them. The labels that we attach to our experience become our thoughts and our memories of that experience. The phrase ‘I’m enraged’ leaves a very different emotional and biochemical memory pattern than does ‘I’m a bit miffed by that.’

Habitual self-language patterns are often not recognised, so people do not realise their influence. However you can begin to appreciate how they (words) affect you when you consider how we are spoken to by others. If somebody told you ‘I think you’re mistaken’, the phrase doesn’t create the same level of emotional response as somebody saying ‘You’re wrong’, and it certainly has nowhere near the same emotional response than if they had said, ‘You’re a damn liar’. All three phrases are essentially saying the same thing, but the level of emotional attachment is orders of magnitude different in each case.

A new study has shown how words in our environment, even on an unconscious level, can dramatically alter your behaviour

Inhibitory self control such as not picking up a cigarette, not having a second drink, not spending when we should be saving, can operate without our awareness or intention.

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg School for Communication and the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign) demonstrated through neuroscience research that inaction-related words in our environment can unconsciously influence our self-control. Mindlessly eating nibbly’s at a party or stopping ourselves from over-indulging may seem impossible without a deliberate, conscious effort. However, the research indicates that overhearing specific language, even in a completely unrelated conversation, saying something as simple as ‘calm down’ might trigger us to curtail our junkie-like biscuit eating frenzy without us even realising it.

Subjects in the study completed a task where they were given instructions to press a computer key when they saw the letter ‘X’ on the computer screen, or not press a key when they saw the letter ‘Y.’ Their actions were affected by subliminal messages flashing rapidly on the screen (too fast to be consciously seen). Action messages such as ‘run,’ ‘go,’ ‘move,’ ‘hit,’ and ‘start’ alternated with inaction messages ‘still,’ ‘sit,’ ‘rest,’ ‘calm,’ and ‘stop’ and nonsense words ‘rnu,’ or ‘tsi’. During the test the subjects wore an EEG (electroencephalogram) device to measure brain activity.

The test was cleverly set-up so that the action or inaction messages had nothing to do with the actions or inactions volunteers were doing, yet the researchers found that the action/inaction words had a definite effect on the volunteers’ brain activity. Unconscious exposure to inaction messages increased the activity of the brain’s self-control processes, whereas unconscious exposure to action messages decreased this same activity.

The researchers said ‘Many important behaviours such as weight loss, giving up smoking, and saving money involve a lot of self-control’. ‘While many psychological theories state that actions can be initiated automatically, with little or no conscious effort, these same theories view inhibition as an effortful, consciously controlled process. Although reaching for that cookie doesn’t require much thought, putting it back on the plate seems to require a deliberate, conscious intervention. Our research challenges the long-held assumption that inhibition processes require conscious control to operate.’

This study further reinforces the concept of words having power; regardless of whether the interaction is on a conscious or an unconscious level.

A good idea (in general, not just in respect of this premise) is to expand your vocabulary. Find a new word to displace the words you usually use when you encounter a situation. Use the new words regularly to heighten the emotional intensity for the positive aspects of your life, and most importantly use new lower impact words for the negative experiences you encounter.

Gradually improving your habitual vocabulary is a wise investment. You’ll rapidly alter how you think, how you feel, and how you behave. Without question there will still be times, for example, when we feel justified in being incensed, but by controlling your language patterns, you will be able to control your emotions to direct and utilise them to better effect. Your choice.

Reference:

Justin Hepler, Dolores Albarracin. Complete unconscious control: Using (in)action primes to demonstrate completely unconscious activation of inhibitory control mechanisms. Cognition, 2013; 128 (3): 271 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.012