Monday, 3 September 2012

Maximum Weight Loss Calculator

Back in January I wrote an article that briefly described a recent representative study which suggested that for permanent fat loss there is a specific threshold that if crossed will compromise your metabolism and future ability to maintain weight. You can read that article by following the link here Link to Article

Thanks to two very smart individuals I've been able to put together a simple, easy to use calculator that provides you with a figure for how much weight you can lose without overstepping this 'metabolic killing' threshold.
All you need to do is follow this link (http://www.hpc-uk.net/5.html) and open up the 'Maximum Weight Loss Calculator'. In the calculator simply enter your current weight and the period of time you are aiming to focus specifically on fat loss. The calculator will return the maximum amount of weight you can lose (for the entire period) without disrupting your metabolism and your end weight.

Give it a shot.

Monday, 13 August 2012

Olympic Legacy

The legacy of the Olympics has been one of the most heavily promoted aspects of the London games, which even has its own development corporation based on using the infrastructure created to regenerate the iconic East End of London.

A legacy is defined as ‘a gift of property, or anything handed down from the past, as from an ancestor or predecessor.’ This particular definition of legacy is what most of the focus is upon, that is how this local area, given a much needed injection of investment, will utilise these resources in order to flourish. But that is a fairly limited view of the legacy, which doesn’t really address the majority of the UK population.

Legacy is also defined as ‘of or pertaining to old or outdated computer hardware, software, or data that, while still functional, does not work well with up-to-date systems.’ This definition on the other hand applies to a legacy that can affect us all regardless of our locale. The reason the location is irrelevant is because we all carry this particular infrastructure within us, it is the only place you can truly call home. That place is your brain.

Unlike a computer infrastructure which cannot keep pace with technological development, the Human brain has a neat trick; it can update its hardware and software in response to the information put into it. However, in order to do this it has to be given the right information, at the right time, in the right way. Without these specific conditions the updates cannot occur. This upgrade is known as neurogenesis, which is the growth of new neurons in the brain. It’s a fairly new science; only really gathering pace around 1997, but substantial amounts of knowledge has been gathered in these 15 years.

So what has this got to do with the Olympics? Well, like myself, you probably have found yourself being a voracious spectator of the amazing displays of skill the Olympians provided over the 2 weeks of the games, whether at the venues or simply in front of your TV. Whilst viewing the sports you probably would’ve felt at least some kind of stimulation from witnessing some of the most magnificent performances ever produced by a Human. However, this level of stimulation does nothing to promote growth of your mind. But real sport participation, that’s a completely different animal.

I use the word ‘real’ purposely, as in the last few years video games using motion sensing technology have become very popular. Although enjoyable, these simulations do not engage the brain in the same way as actual participation, and do not stimulate growth of the brain. In fact there’s mounting evidence, especially in regards to sporting performance, that they may actually hinder it.

Taking part in physical activity, especially those that require higher degrees of skill and the necessary focus and mental application to be successful, are key to promoting growth of new neurons, especially in the areas of the brain that are particularly vulnerable to degeneration; the striatum and the hippocampus. The striatal cortex is the area of your brain responsible for balance, movement and decision making. The hippocampus is where your memories are formed. Loss of neurons and functioning in these key areas are central in development of Parkinson’s (Striatum) and Alzheimer’s (both Striatum and Hippocampus).

As is becoming readily apparent, our increased longevity is opening the doors to disease states that were in less long-lived days fairly rarely seen. These longer lived diseases will primarily affect the brain, whereas we can patch up or replace many body-parts; with the brain it’s not quite so simple. You have to create what’s called a cognitive reserve, which is essentially a buffer, so that even when the inevitable neuronal die-off occurs, you have hopefully built up enough neurons to see you through your days intact. And this is where sports and physical activity come into play; they help build this cognitive reserve infrastructure. Two of the ways it does this is through increased blood flow to vital areas of the brain, and stimulation of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) which we know is key for improvements in learning and memory.

If you already participate in sport or physical activity, that’s great, but to take advantage of your brains ability to grow new neurons, activity must tick a few boxes.

It needs to voluntary. It’s likely that forced activity creates an excessive stress response, which among other things elevates levels of Cortisol. Chronic levels of Cortisol are a known cause of neuron loss in the Hippocampus.

As previously suggested it needs to demand your attention, if it’s so easy that there is no active involvement then there is little stimulation to your brain. Challenge is key, which leads onto the next requirement, adrenaline.

Although an excessive stress response is detrimental, a lower level of stress is needed to illicit a response. So sports and activities that cause excitement are definitely order of the day. Again, this leads onto a further requirement; success and failure. You have to perceive whether you’ve been successful or unsuccessful in order for your brain to set up the correct environment for growth. And key to this, is how closely the signal follows the execution. The more immediate the signal for success or failure is to the action, the more effective the stimulation. This is related to an axiom in neuroscience known as Hebbian theory which is summed up as ‘neurons that fire together, wire together’.

To further up the ante in regards to success/ failure, alongside the signal there needs to be immediate reward or punishment for success or failure respectively. In regards to this success/failure outcome, the sport or activity should be sufficiently adjusted in difficulty so that failure occurs approximately once every 6-10 times.

So if you’ve found yourself inspired by a sport from the games, or you’ve seen a sport that you may not even known existed, make use of your current excitement and go and get involved.

Regenerate your own infrastructure and become part of the Olympic legacy, it’s the best investment you’ll ever make.

Thursday, 19 July 2012

1 Percent’ers



According to recent statistics only 25% of the (English) population gets a minimum of 30 minutes of activity 3 times per week (90 minutes total).1

The recommended minimum amount of moderate intensity exercise is 150 minutes per week (or 75 min’s of vigorous activity). So in regards to the above statistic we are falling woefully short, even more so if you follow the WHO (World Health Organisation) guidelines of 300 minutes per week (or 150 min’s of vigorous activity) in order to achieve additional health benefits.

If you already are achieving the above recommendations; well done and keep it going. If however, you are part of the 75% who are not even getting a minimum of 90 minutes per week, you may want to consider incorporating physical activity into your daily schedule. I’m fully aware that life today is extremely busy and it often seems impossible to grab a bit of ‘me’ time, but entertain me for a moment.

A day is 1,440 minutes long, so each 1% of this is roughly 15 minutes. If you can find a way to set aside approximately 1% on 3 days out of a week (less than 1 ½ percent of your entire week) then here’s a workout* that you can use to begin making amends.

This workout is an example of what is known as a metabolic complex, they’re generally used as an alternative to usual ‘cardio’ sessions, or as a means of conditioning for many sports. The great thing about them is their density. That is, they involve a lot of volume in a short period of time, so they are an extremely efficient way of exercising.  

Essentially the complex involves a series of Barbell exercises using the same weight performed sequentially without a rest between exercises for a determined amount of repetitions per circuit. Once you complete the complex, you rest for the designated time (in this case 90 seconds).

The exercises used are:

A1 Deadlift
A2 ‘Stiff’-Leg Deadlift
A3 Bent-Over Row
A4 Front Squat
A5 Overhead Press
A6 Back Squat

Here’s a fairly rudimentary schedule you can use, that runs for 6 weeks. At the end of the 6 weeks you simply increase the weight (based on your 8 repetition maximum for the Overhead Press) and start the schedule over.

Week 1- 1, 2, 3, 2, 1

Week 2- 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1

Week 3- 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

Week 4- 1, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 1

Week 5- 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

Week 6- 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

So in week 1 you would perform the complex by doing 1 repetition of each exercise in a row. You would then rest 90 seconds, then complete the second set by doing each exercise for 2 repetitions then resting again for 90 seconds and so on until all sets are completed.

To get the most benefit in terms of metabolism the complex is best done in the morning.

Give it a go and let me know how you’re getting along.

*Bear in mind this is simply a workout, it does not constitute training, or a program, which are many magnitudes different in respect to strength and conditioning.

References

1.  http://www.aso.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2012/03/2012-Statistics-on-Obesity-Physical-Activity-and-Diet-England.pdf (Accessed 19/ 7/ 2012)

Thursday, 28 June 2012

It's not about the Calories


A recent study has provided further support that when it comes to regulating bodyweight the emphasis on 'Caloric content' is erroneous.

21 overweight/ obese individuals were recruited to participate in the study. To do so the subjects were required to demonstrate a loss of 10-15% bodyweight prior to the start of the study, as the purpose of the study was to investigate the ability to maintain weight loss, not create weight loss per se.

The subjects were divided into 3 groups; low fat; low glycemic; and very low carbohydrate. All diets were 'iso-caloric', meaning they contained the same amount of Calories, the difference being the macro-nutrient (Protein, Lipids and Carbohydrate) ratios that comprised the diets. The subjects followed these diets for 4 weeks.

The results were not really surprising; the low carbohydrate diet resulted in the least reduction in both Resting and Total Energy Expenditure, demonstrating a maintenance of metabolic rate. The low fat diet (similar to the usual dietary advice given by most health authorities) showed the largest drops in metabolic rate. The low glycemic diet was in-between these two diets, but closer to the low carbohydrate diet.

In a nutshell the difference in Total Energy Expenditure between the low fat Vs low carbohydrate is 300Kcal per day, even though the intakes were deemed similar.

There are flaws in the study, which hopefully a follow up study will resolve, but I expect the result will not be dissimilar.

So what is happening?

As I've said before, Calories are only vaguely related to how Humans process food. We don't consume Calories, store them or burn them, but because the term and idea has become so entrenched in the common psyche it's hard to get people to think using a different mental construct.

The study, in addition to Energy Expenditure, also measured a number of key hormones and this (the changes in hormones) begins to tell the real story.

The hormones measured (or related measures) were leptin, thyroid stimulating hormone, triiodothyronine, and free urinary cortisol, insulin sensitivity (indexes derived from an oral glucose tolerance test ), high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 activity, and high sensitivity C-reactive protein [CRP].

For most indices the low fat group fared worst, whereas the low carbohydrate improved the indices most, except for two; 24 hour Cortisol excretion and C-Reactive Protein. Cortisol is a measure of stress and CRP is a measure of inflammation, both hormones are intimately linked with each other and also in adiposity via Insulin resistance, so this is a fly in the ointment of this particular dieting format.

The low glycemic group again was somewhere in the middle, showing improvements in most indices better than the low fat group, but not quite as good as the low carbohydrate group. However, the low glycemic group modulated their cortisol better (and probably as a consequence CRP), which is a known effect of low, but stable blood glucose/ Insulin.

So from a purely metabolic rate stand-point the low carbohydrate diet is the clear favourite, however, due to the Cortisol/ CRP issue, it's certainly not ideal.

The low glycemic diet demonstrated modulation of the Cortisol/ CRP pathways, but it didn't quite have the same metabolic impact of the low carbohydrate diet, so although good, again it's not ideal.

Is there a way to gain the benefits of all of the different diets? Absolutely. In fact we can actually surpass the benefits of any of the individual diets and utilise their specific strengths; it's all a matter of timing. Taking into account the temporal effect of physiology and adjusting our environment to account for this, we can hugely increase our metabolic rate and improve our biomarkers of health all without a need to deprive ourselves of any type of food.

If you'd like to learn how to do this, the Lean for Life Program will show you in the easiest possible manner. To find out more about this state of the art program, follow the link below. As a bonus, the Lean for Life Program is being offered at a 50% discount for the group beginning in August 2012.


Reference:

Ebbeling, Cara B. Effects of Dietary Composition on Energy Expenditure During Weight-Loss Maintenance. JAMA. 2012;307(24):2627-2634. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.6607

Wednesday, 27 June 2012

Mr and Ms Average

Looking at the most current figures the average UK resident is in fairly woeful shape. Ms Average is a touch over 5 ft 3 inches and weighs in at 11 stones with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 26.9. If Ms Average is 30 years of age then her body-fat percentage is about 35%.

To give you an idea of what this looks like, if you look at the attached image (above), the two photos on the left are a visual representation of a female at about 35% (although the lady in this picture is over 5 ft 4 inches, so this would be a ‘good’ example of 35%). The photo on the right is the same lady at about 18% body-fat.

To take Ms. Average from 35% to 18% and remain there without a subsequent constant battle with the scale is achievable in as little as 6 months if the right approach is adopted. 








Approximately 25% Vs. 10% Bodyfat

Mr Average fares about the same. Mr Average is about 5 ft 9 inches, 12 and a half stones with a BMI of 27.4. Again, assuming he is 30 years of age, his body-fat percentage is about 24%.

In the same 6 months Mr. Average could go from 24% body-fat to approximately 10% without too much upheaval in their life.

This is what the Lean for Life Program sets out to achieve. The Lean for Life Program guides you one step at a time; essentially one habit per week, for 26 weeks to a place where your body is metabolically primed to remain lean permanently with minimal effort.

And in July the Lean for Life Program is being offered at a 50% discount.

For more details please see http://www.hpc-uk.net/6.html

Fat Loss Done Right

Graphical representation of the amount of fat lost over 6 months. This is 104 packets of butter.

Quarter Turns - Front

Quarter Turns - Side
Quarter Turns - Rear

This final photo was taken a few days before the final set of photo's. It has slightly better lighting, which shows the actual width of Russ' back compared to his waist. It demonstrates that not only has Russ lost a substantial amount of fat, but in the process gained a significant amount of lean body mass at the same time. This puts him in a better position now than at the beginning to further recompose his body composition, as he has more muscle tissue and an increased number, density, and activity of his mitochondria.

Whereas other 'weight loss' programs cause a down shift in metabolism and the supposed 'inevitable plateau', Russell has primed his metabolism to be able to shift up further, in addition to which it has already.

Gut Bacteria and Health

Link to Study Overview

During the assessment process I perform with clients one of the most important and revealing components is the medical history work-up. Part of this history is a very direct and specific section on gastro-intestinal health. One of the questions is whether the client has ever taken a course of antibiotics. If the answer is yes, an immediate red flag is lifted.

I’ll just give you a quick prĂ©cis of the link between gut health and overall health as it’s a fairly complicated cascade. Please bear in mind that this is only one way it can be impactful.

An imbalance in gut microflora (bacteria), usually after (but not limited to) taking a course of antibiotics, allows certain populations (of bacteria) to become dominant. One good example is Candida, which in people with depressed immunity grows out of control and causes ill health. The Candida bacteria/ fungi have microscopic projections (roots) much like grappling hooks that allow them to cling onto the intestinal wall. To perform this, the projections known as Rhizoids pierce through the intestine which sets up a condition known as a ‘leaky gut’. Leaky gut syndrome is a condition where toxins, bacteria and other particles can move thorough the intestinal wall into the systemic circulation. To counter this threat the body mounts an immune response to remove or destroy the invasive item.

Both the damage to the intestinal wall, and the foreign entry into the circulation (as we’ve looked at in previous pieces on Immunity), lead to the creation of an inflammatory environment in the intestines and also the entire body.

Because of the direct involvement of the Digestive System and the Liver, a leaky gut will also cause a massive burden on the Liver due to the increased level of toxins introduced to the body which it attempts to detoxify and remove. The liver, in addition to being overworked becomes inflamed and if you look back to the piece posted on April 8th 2012 concerning circadian rhythms, you’ll see the eventual consequence of this situation, that being (initially) Non-Alcoholic Liver Steatohepatitis (NASH) and (eventually) by association the CHAOS complex of Diseases.

One of the initial steps is to rebalance the gut microflora, however this is not as simple as drinking a little probiotic drink each day, that’s fine to maintain an already balanced environment, but for cases where the environment has already been disturbed (the majority of people) you need a bit more of a targeted approach. First of all you need to know whether you have an unbalanced environment.

It would take to much space to list all of the associated symptoms, however if you would like to begin to determine whether you have an unbalanced microflora population I have a quick and easy questionnaire that will give you a nod in the right direction. Just send me a message and I’ll drop the file into your inbox.