In the previous piece we
looked at the way limiting food intake decreases Resting Metabolic Rate
(RMR) which accounts for 50-75% of your daily energy expenditure.
Remember I mentioned Energy Flux, well the simple act of eating less
causes your body to become extremely
conservative with its resources (especially fat stores). Imagine a
hungry dog with a bone; you haven’t got a chance in hell of getting it
to give it up without a fight.
We also saw that by eating less
you weren’t capitalising on the process known as the Thermic Effect of
Feeding, which depending on the foods consumed can result in a
teeny-tiny increase in metabolic rate or if the right foods are chosen
can account for a fairly noticeable jump in metabolism; meat sweats,
anyone?
One of the biggest problems, which directly ties into
both of these components of metabolism, is muscle loss. Without a shadow
of doubt, the biggest influence on your metabolism that you have in
your control is the amount of muscle you carry and how much activity you
ask that muscle to perform. The problem with usual dieting is that they
do not emphasise either an increase, or even at a minimum, maintenance
of muscle. With usual dieting, yes you’ll lose a little fat (nowhere
near as much as you are lead to believe); however a lot of muscle is
lost in the process. This is disastrous.
In a famine situation
(the body doesn’t know otherwise), your muscle is metabolically very
costly, it chews up energy like there’s no tomorrow, and doesn’t provide
much energy when it’s broken down. Fat cells on the other hand are very
efficient at storing energy and when the fat content is broken down it
provides over three times as much energy as glucose*. Which do you think
will support life the longest? Exactly, the body gives up muscle in a
heartbeat, but aggressively defends its fat stores.
So, absolutely you’ll lose a little weight from the scale, but it’s not the right type of weight.
Going back to Energy Flux again (Remember this is not the fallacious
concept of Energy Balance; Calories In vs. Calories Out), which is the
flow of energy in and out of your body, the ‘in’ part is generally
provided by the food we eat and the ‘out’ part is all the processes in
your body which we combine to call metabolism. The largest influence
with have over the ‘out’ part is our Physical Activity Level (PAL). And
this is where it gets tricky.
Physical activity will of
course require energy to be performed, but the body, ever the economist,
will try to make that activity as efficient as possible. Some types of
activity will promote more efficiency than others, so even though you
are more active than before, your body will learn to do it at the lowest
investment of energy. This is why some forms of exercise are amazing
for certain types of fitness, but is horrendous if your pursuit is fat
loss, they make the body extremely efficient, even at rest.
So
in some cases, by doing the wrong type of exercise, in combination with
reduced energy intake, will actually cause your metabolism to slow
down, rather than speed up.
This is not understood by most
mainstream programs, which still, regardless of their attempts to
seemingly update their system, suggest you can trade off a walk for a
cake. This is still, although wrapped up in different clothing, the old
and erroneous ‘Energy Balance’ concept; however you want to ‘play’ it.
To learn how to drop the right type of weight (and have verifiable
proof that it is fat loss) join us in the Lean for Life Program where
you’ll be provided with the knowledge and the tools to create the body
you want and deserve. Click on the link to find out more…
http://hpc-uk.net/6.html
* Even though muscle is composed of protein when it’s broken down it
produces amino acids which the liver can convert into glucose
No comments:
Post a Comment